The question is whether he is an expert or a layman working in a new sector. After author research, an essay writer should go straight to the source. You can investigate whether or not a source is peer-reviewed, reliable, expert, published, or documented. A literature review is generally preferable over journal articles after extensive study on author and source. Consider this: if you don't know when, it's because they've been peer-reviewed, proven, and published.
What exactly do we mean when we say "read"? Consequently, when writing a review, you don't have to merely read or scan the work; you may spend more time thinking about it. But, you must carefully analyze the source; however, how do you go about doing so? The first step is to do some background research on the author. During author research, one of the questions that might be asked is whether or not the author is an expert. You should seek his area of expertise to see if he is even affiliated with this field of study.
When you finally sit down to read, make sure you have some goals in mind. To write your review quickly, you should ask yourself all of the questions listed below. Because these questions require you to consider things on a larger scale. They will improve your critical thinking ability. The questions are as follows:
Who are the essay writer behind this project's research? Are they well-known or well-respected in this field? What school of thinking do they subscribe to?
What is the goal of conducting this study? What exactly are they attempting to prove or discover? Was it even possible for them to succeed?
Are they partisan or apolitical when it comes to their research? What are their points of view?
What is the significance or importance of this research?
Is it appropriate to compare findings and studies as if they are interconnected and mutually supportive of one another?
What is a strength analysis of research methodology?
Should I search for any other study that either supports or contradicts it?
Important: Is this study relevant to my field of work?
One of the most important aspects of drafting a good literature review is organization. According to an essay writing service, it helps you avoid mishandling and forgetting key points when reading. Simply said, arranging your notes or thoughts is what it is. There are a variety of methods for gathering your ideas, and we will even share some of them with you. Before you proceed, there is one thing you should keep in mind. It's worth noting that the study's organization is always determined by the research topic and objectives. You must synthesize your views and answer all of the criticisms that you encounter while reading. You can categorize your thoughts or notes:
The authors' point of view is chronological
Thematically (like an essay)
We also have some suggestions for you, which is that you should start by establishing a plan. Then you can include your thoughts into the plan as you continue reading.
Finally, we've arrived. To create a literature review, you must understand the two main components of the review.
The descriptive or reporting component is a description of the subject. It details what occurred and what the author stated or discovered. You should include the second aspect as well, otherwise, you will overlook the most important part of the literature study.
An interpretive or critical aspect is a critical component of the literature evaluation. It's a conversation between the author's findings and our interpretation. You will pose and answer questions in this review. Furthermore, you assess the work before explaining and interpreting the data. Additionally, you synthesize the data to build an opinion.
You must also know how to transition from description to interpretation, depending on the importance of the interpretative element.
Let's have a look at a multi-layered method. When writing a literature review, you will come to a moment where you must adhere to a specific point. It's not like you're constantly criticizing the writer or the study. When critiquing, you must adhere to the pattern outlined in the preceding example. The writer of the literature review first summarizes what an author of a study discovered, then presents his critique, and then suggests a solution. This is referred to as a layered approach.
When you're critiquing, you should also be aware of the language you're using. It is critical to exercise extreme caution while selecting vocabulary for the literature study. Trust me, I found that it’s better to learn this than for me to ask somebody to write my essay. Two distinct languages are utilized to express two distinct types of critiques.
Now that you've covered all of the essential aspects and procedures of producing a literature review, you may go on to the next step. Let's put you to the test. Read the following literature study on the topic of "resilience at the micro-level" carefully and respond to the following questions: Is it on-topic and relevant?
Is this a critical or interpretative review?
Yes, that is absolutely on topic and pertinent, according to the answers.
It is not, however, critical or interpretive. It's chock-full of shopping lists culled from the literature review's descriptive section.
Analyze your performance by asking yourself the following questions:
Have you read and analyzed the sources? Used a clear structure?
Reported and described the research?
Have you interpreted the findings?
Have you questioned the research?
Have the solutions been presented?
Is there anything written on the subject?
Did you use my voice - the voice of the author?